Talk:Nuestra Señora de Atocha
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Nuestra Señora de Atocha be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in Spain may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Omissions make this Article misleading
[edit]The Article states:
- He [Mel Fisher] also proposed the idea to several other potential helpers who were discouraged by the fact that this dangerous professional diving job was at minimum wage unless the ship was found. The Atocha wreck and its mother lode of silver, gold, and emeralds was finally discovered in July 1985. It was Mel's son, Kane, who radioed the news to Treasure Salvors headquarters on the Florida coast, from the salvage boat Dauntless.
In fact, the "discovery" took place years earlier. By 1975 numerous artifacts linked the wreck to the Atocha. The same source cited for the comment above states:
- In 1975, his son Dirk found five bronze cannon whose markings would clinch identification with the Atocha. Only days later, Dirk and his wife Angel, with diver Rick Gage, were killed when one of the salvage boats capsized.
At that point, investors and workers were much easier to find. There are numerous other sources for this information. Komowkwa (talk) 15:12, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
- Agree. The State of Florida vs Mel Fisher disagreement was said to have been resolved in 1982, after eight years of court cases(s), started after discovery of Atoha. That would make the discovery having been made in 1974. Or is the court dating wrong? It seems the discovery of the mother load (in 1985) and the discovery of parts of the ship/load many years earlier have been mixed together.--Paracel63 (talk) 15:55, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nuestra Señora de Atocha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070208060902/http://www.vlex.us/caselaw/U-S-Supreme-Court/Florida-Dept-of-State-v-Treasure-Salvors-Inc-458-U-S-670-1982/2100-19979618,01.html to http://vlex.us/caselaw/U-S-Supreme-Court/Florida-Dept-of-State-v-Treasure-Salvors-Inc-458-U-S-670-1982/2100-19979618%2C01.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:43, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Italicized titles
[edit]When I try to do the DISPLAYTITLE template, it says there's a conflict with pre-existing code, "Nuestra Señora de Atocha", but the title isn't italicized. Is there a way to fix this? Packer1028 (talk) 21:02, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Is the statement based on a reliable source?
[edit]Article claims: "After eight years of litigation, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favour of Fisher on 1 July 1992, and he was awarded rights to all found treasure from the vessel." So the lawyers got nothing? (PeacePeace (talk) 23:08, 11 July 2018 (UTC))